Question 1
The idea is the following: we want to alternate the sign of the number first. The easiest way to do that is to use . The next thing is that we want this function to sort of center around 0, that means that we start around , and just slowly move around , and do something like , , etc.
Why first? Because when , .
So consider See how it starts at ?
Okay as usual, we need to prove that:
- is surjective.
- is injective.
Lemma
It’s going to be useful to show this first. Claim: is negative if and only if is odd.
- Let be odd. I.e. .
- Then
- Then
- .
- Since .
- Let be even. I.e. .
- .
- Since , .
Proof
Claim: The given is surjective. Remark: The tricky part about this one is that when we take an arbitrary as output of , we don’t yet know how to argue whether is even or odd. So we begin with this first:
Now we can try to prove surjectivity.
- Let be arbitrarily chosen.
- Either or .
- Case 1:
- Then consider .
- Since
- Also since , , by closure of on .
- Therefore
- Case 2:
- Then consider .
- Also since , , and , and .
- So .
- Also by closure of multiplication and subtraction/addition, .
- Therefore .
- Therefore
- In all cases it is shown that .
- By universal generalisation, .
Now we move to prove is injective.
Proof
Claim: The given is injective.
- Let arbitrarily chosen. Further assume .
- Now, by the Lemma, either both are even, or x_2$ are odd.
- Case 1: Both are even.
- Now .
- By the assumption,
- Then by line 3.1 and basic algebra: .
- Case 2: Both are odd.
- Now .
- By the assumption,
- Then by line 3.1 and basic algebra: .
- In all cases it is shown that .
- By universal generalisation, .
Question 2:
Part (a):
Gonna be honest guys. Never have I ever used a “sequence argument” or heard about it until I looked at the tutorial closely. I don’t think any of my friends in math have either. Make of this comment what you will.
- By lemma 9.2, one may write out as , for some .
- By lemma , one may write out as
- Now consider sequence
- This is a sequence that contains all elements of .
- Therefore is countable. By Lemma 9.2.
Comments
Note here it doesn’t extend to the union of two infinite sets. Unless you start writing something like:
If you write: You’re creating something called . But story for another day.
Part(b)
I much prefer this. Now the overarching idea is the following, we want the function to map the first values to elements in , then the values onwards to . What you have is a bijection function and a .
The tricky part is that they’re insisting on asking for a bijection so we need to take care to remove duplicates between and .
So here’s the idea:
- List the elements in that are not in first.
- Then list the elements of .
Proof
- Let set .
- Since is finite, is also finite.