Question 1

The idea is the following: we want to alternate the sign of the number first. The easiest way to do that is to use . The next thing is that we want this function to sort of center around 0, that means that we start around , and just slowly move around , and do something like , , etc.

Why first? Because when , .

So consider See how it starts at ?

Okay as usual, we need to prove that:

  1. is surjective.
  2. is injective.

Lemma

It’s going to be useful to show this first. Claim: is negative if and only if is odd.

  1. Let be odd. I.e. .
  2. Then
  3. Then
  4. .
  5. Since .
  6. Let be even. I.e. .
  7. .
  8. Since , .

Proof

Claim: The given is surjective. Remark: The tricky part about this one is that when we take an arbitrary as output of , we don’t yet know how to argue whether is even or odd. So we begin with this first:

Now we can try to prove surjectivity.

  1. Let be arbitrarily chosen.
  2. Either or .
  3. Case 1:
  4. Then consider .
  5. Since
  6. Also since , , by closure of on .
  7. Therefore
  8. Case 2:
  9. Then consider .
  10. Also since , , and , and .
  11. So .
  12. Also by closure of multiplication and subtraction/addition, .
  13. Therefore .
  14. Therefore
  15. In all cases it is shown that .
  16. By universal generalisation, .

Now we move to prove is injective.

Proof

Claim: The given is injective.

  1. Let arbitrarily chosen. Further assume .
  2. Now, by the Lemma, either both are even, or x_2$ are odd.
  3. Case 1: Both are even.
  4. Now .
  5. By the assumption,
  6. Then by line 3.1 and basic algebra: .
  7. Case 2: Both are odd.
  8. Now .
  9. By the assumption,
  10. Then by line 3.1 and basic algebra: .
  11. In all cases it is shown that .
  12. By universal generalisation, .

Question 2:

Part (a):

Gonna be honest guys. Never have I ever used a “sequence argument” or heard about it until I looked at the tutorial closely. I don’t think any of my friends in math have either. Make of this comment what you will.

  1. By lemma 9.2, one may write out as , for some .
  2. By lemma , one may write out as
  3. Now consider sequence
  4. This is a sequence that contains all elements of .
  5. Therefore is countable. By Lemma 9.2.

Comments

Note here it doesn’t extend to the union of two infinite sets. Unless you start writing something like:

If you write: You’re creating something called . But story for another day.

Part(b)

I much prefer this. Now the overarching idea is the following, we want the function to map the first values to elements in , then the values onwards to . What you have is a bijection function and a .

The tricky part is that they’re insisting on asking for a bijection so we need to take care to remove duplicates between and .

So here’s the idea:

  1. List the elements in that are not in first.
  2. Then list the elements of .

Proof

  1. Let set .
  2. Since is finite, is also finite.